GERMANY VIDEO REVIEW · VISION LOADING

One Camera Sweep and It Grips: RoboJob's AI Vision Loading, Live-Tested at EMO

One camera sweep and it grips: RoboJob's AI vision loading, live-tested at EMO—article cover image
TL;DR Belgian-founded RoboJob is a specialist in CNC load/unload automation in Europe, and German media outlet Voice of CNC live-tested its Pallet Load Integrate system at EMO 2025. The capability list in the video's description is very concrete: a 2D camera on the gripper generates 3D spatial data, AI recognizes workpieces on a wooden pallet—reflections and texture don't matter—workpieces don't need to be pre-lined-up or sorted (push the pallet in and it starts), setup takes under 5 minutes, and it works for forgings, heavy parts, and varying geometry. The host runs a live "shift-the-workpiece" challenge to see whether the system keeps up. This video is worth reading alongside TRUMPF's programming-free sorting: vision AI is dismantling the most expensive prerequisite of traditional load/unload automation—"the workpiece must be neatly positioned." The cost of lining-up fixtures, rack positioning, and batch-by-batch teaching disappears piece by piece, and the barrier to high-mix small-batch load/unload automation drops accordingly; and it shares a root with AI drawing reading: both are about letting the machine "understand geometry" on its own.

01What this live-test video is about

Voice of CNC's second RoboJob video in its EMO 2025 series stars the new Pallet Load Integrate system—an automation solution where a robot grabs workpieces from a material pallet and loads them onto the machine. Unlike a brochure-style intro, host Alex tests it live (testet live) on the floor, and even adds a "workpiece-shift challenge (Bauteil-Verschiebe-Challenge)": shifting the workpieces on the pallet to see whether the system can still find and grab them[1].

EMO 2025 live test: a 2D camera builds 3D spatial data, AI recognizes pallet workpieces, 5-minute setup (open on YouTube)

The capability list in the description reads like a spec sheet[1]: a 2D camera generates 3D spatial data; AI recognizes workpieces on a wooden pallet, with reflections and texture not affecting it; no pre-lining-up, no sorting—push the pallet in and it starts; setup in under 5 minutes; suitable for forgings, heavy parts, and varying geometry.

02Technical breakdown: 2D camera, 3D space, AI recognition

Every item on the list corresponds to a concrete technical choice:

Theoretically, this is the same family of technology as AI drawing reading—feature-recognition research (such as FeatureNet) has proven that neural networks can "understand geometry" with high accuracy[2]; the only difference is whether the input is a camera image or an engineering drawing. The machine's ability to understand geometry is rewriting both the "machine-side" and "off-machine" stages of the flow at the same time.

03Which costs it dismantles

The hidden-cost list of traditional robot load/unload is exactly why high-mix small-batch shops shy away from automation:

Traditional prerequisiteHidden costAfter vision AI
Workpieces need lining-up and positioningLining-up fixtures, racks, manual placementPush the pallet straight in, the AI finds them[1]
Batch-by-batch teachingEngineer time per batch changeRecognition replaces teaching, setup in minutes[1]
Amortization over batch sizeSmall batches can't spread the upfront costThe upfront cost itself is compressed; small batches start to pay off

This is exactly the process by which the "what parts aren't suited to automation" list in Robot loading/unloading primer gets rewritten—the boundary is moving, and the criteria need to update with it.

04The evaluation angle for Taiwan's shops

After watching this test, when a Taiwanese high-mix small-batch shop evaluates load/unload automation, its list of questions should update to:

  1. How much does a batch change cost? Don't just ask about cycle time—ask "what does a person do for a batch change, and how long does it take"—this is where the vision solution's core value lies.
  2. Can it handle your material situation? Take your messiest pallet (mixed material, reflective parts, stacking) and try it—the video's "shift challenge" is exactly the right testing mindset.
  3. Can program supply keep up? The old question once more: once the robot loads the material onto the machine, the machine needs a program to run. Load/unload automation makes the machines churn faster, and the "waiting for programs" bottleneck only becomes more obvious—preparation-chain automation (AI reads drawings, generates code within the in-house tool library and machine constraints, simulates, verifies dimensions) should go in sync or ahead (see The complete guide to CNC auto-programming).

Machine-side vision AI and off-machine drawing-reading AI are essentially two ends of the same thing: let the machine understand geometry, and let people do less translation. Only when both ends go in together does full-flow automation for high-mix small-batch truly take shape.

05FAQ

What's the difference between vision-based loading and traditional robot loading?

Traditional solutions require workpieces to be lined up and positioned (fixtures, racks, manual placement) and taught batch by batch; the vision solution uses a camera plus AI to let the robot recognize the workpieces and their pose on the pallet itself—no lining-up needed, no re-teaching per batch, and the setup time in the video's live test is under 5 minutes. What gets dismantled is exactly the upfront cost that small batches can't spread out.

Is "a 2D camera generating 3D spatial data" reliable?

This is a mature route that reconstructs depth information from 2D images by algorithm, at a cost far below a 3D scanner. Reliability depends on the actual material situation—reflections, texture, stacking. The right way to evaluate it is exactly what the video demonstrates: live-test it with your messiest pallet, and even deliberately move a workpiece to see how the system reacts.

Load/unload automation or program-preparation automation—which comes first?

If your machines are often waiting for programs, do the preparation chain first—load/unload automation makes the machines churn faster, and the waiting-for-programs bottleneck will only get bigger. The ideal is both ends in sync: machine-side vision AI handles the variation in material, off-machine drawing-reading AI handles the variation in drawings, and both are essentially "letting the machine understand geometry"—together they make up complete high-mix automation.

Subscribe to the technical blog newsletter

Get notified when new articles and video reviews go live—no inbox flooding, one-click unsubscribe. (newsletter in Chinese)

GEOMETRY UNDERSTOOD

Machine-side, let AI recognize the workpiece; off-machine, let AI read the drawing

Before load/unload automation, make sure program supply keeps up: AI reads drawings, generates code, simulates, and verifies—use your drawing to measure the preparation chain's speed.

Contact an adoption consultant Training courses

📋 Free download: CNC RFQ Checklist (printable) (中文)

← Back to the BestAI CAM product overview

06References

  1. IndustryArena / Voice of CNC (YouTube). RoboJob auf der EMO 2025 - Part2: Palettenhandling next level mit KI & Kamera! (published 2025-11-06, live-tested at EMO 2025). youtube.com/watch?v=en1IlMc_5io
  2. Zhang, Z., Jaiswal, P., & Rai, R. (2018). FeatureNet: Machining feature recognition based on 3D Convolutional Neural Network. Computer-Aided Design, 101, 12–22.
  3. Wang, J., Ma, Y., Zhang, L., Gao, R. X., & Wu, D. (2018). Deep learning for smart manufacturing: Methods and applications. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 48, 144–156.
  4. Groover, M. P. (2019). Automation, Production Systems, and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing (5th ed.). Pearson.